Ashu Khanna and Bindu Arora
Ganesh and Raghurama (2008), believe that training improves the capabilities of employees by enhancing
their skills, knowledge and commitment towards their work In the survey conducted by them, about 80 executive
from Corporation Bank and Karnataka Bank Ltd of India, were requested to rate their subordinates in terms of
development of their skills before and after they underwent certain commonly delivered training programs.
Responses revealed that for the seventeen skills identified there was improvement in the skills statistically. The
paired t-test was applied individually for the seventeen skills, and all these skills have shown statistical
significance. The seventeen skills include analytical skill, human resource skill, marketing skill, communication
skill, accounting skill, credit appraisal skill, cash management skill, time management skill, inter-branch
reconciliation skill, conceptual skill, information technology related skill, technical skill, role identification skill,
problem solving skill, behavioural skill, risk management skill and customer service skill.
Haugen and Selin (1999) discussed the value of internal controls. Internal control system has four broad
objectives: to safeguard assets of the firm, to ensure the accuracy and reliability of accounting records and
information, to promote efficiency in firm‟s operations and to measure compliance with management prescribed
policies and procedures. The effectiveness of internal controls depends largely on management‟s integrity. There
are many other reasons for employee fraud, the more common being revenge, overwhelming personal debt, and
substance abuse. Business today is very competitive, and employees often stressed. As a result, they have a
feeling of being overworked, underpaid, and unappreciated. If employees are also struggling with serious
personal problems, their motivation to commit fraud is very high. Adding to the situation of poor internal
controls, the readily available computer technology also assists in the crime, and the opportunity to commit fraud
becomes a reality.
Harris and William (2004) examined the reasons for loan frauds in banks and emphasised on due diligence
program. This is a proactive approach, with each business line within the institution establishing policies and
procedures for conducting due diligence investigations for both new and existing customers .They indicated that
lack of an effective internal audit staff at the company, frequent turnover of management or directors,
appointment of unqualified persons in key audit or finance posts, customer‟s reluctance to provide requested
information or financial statements and fictitious or conflicting data provided by the customers are the main
reasons for loan frauds. Fraud thrives when conditions are right. A "fraud-friendly environment" is characterized
by lax corporate culture on the enforcement of internal controls; deficient and/or absence of requisite risk
controls, staff apathy and overconfidence.
Jeffords (1992) examined 910 cases submitted to the Internal Auditor during the nine-year period from
1981-1989 to assess the specific risk factors cited in the Treadway Commission Report. Approximately 63
percent of the 910 cases are classified under the internal control risks that include: lack of regular independent
checks in performance, inadequate organizational control methods, inadequate methods of communicating or
enforcing the assignment of authority and responsibility; and unauthorized access and physical control of assets,
records, computer programs, or data.
Bhasin (2007) examined the reasons for cheques frauds, the magnitude of frauds in Indian banks, and the
manner, in which the expertise of internal auditors can be integrated, in order to detect and prevent frauds in
banks. He emphasized that though the head of the branch holds the responsibility for ensuring adherence to
prescribed systems and procedures, the bank's internal auditors also occupy a special position in the detection
and prevention of frauds. In addition to considering the common types of fraud „signals', auditors can take
several „proactive' steps to combat frauds. Checking frauds requires training, account screening, signature
verification and information sharing with regulators and local authorities. One important challenge for banks,
therefore, is the examination of new technology applications for control and security issues.
Sharma and Brahma (2000) have emphasized on Banker‟s responsibility on frauds. They indicated that bank
frauds could crop up in all spheres of bank‟s dealing, like cheque frauds, deposit account frauds, purchase bill
fraud, hypothecation fraud, loan fraud, frauds in foreign exchange transactions and inter-branch account. Major
cause for perpetration of fraud is laxity in observance in laid down system and procedures by supervising staff.
Unscrupulous constituents commit frauds by taking advantage of the laxity on the part of the officials in
observance of time-tested safeguards established by Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The RBI has set up an
investigation cell in its central office. Ace investigator of high and vast experience mans it. The bank team goes
deep into the root cause of bank frauds and suggests exhaustive preventive measures. The RBI carries out
detailed studies and researches in the commission of bank frauds and recommends innovations to prevent frauds.
The authors have further suggested that the need of the hour is not another piece of complex high-powered body
of RBI, but analysis and concerted application of controls by bank management and their operational staff.
Smith (1995) offered a typology of individuals who embezzle. He indicated that embezzlers are
“opportunist‟s type”, who quickly detects the lack of weakness in internal control and seizes the opportunity to
use the deficiency to his benefit. To deter embezzlement he recommended the following measures:-
Institute strong internal control policies, which reduce the opportunity of crime.
Conduct an aggressive and thorough background check prior to employment.